Most Active Stories
- Crashed Air Force drone was flying with gear that couldn't handle cold
- Schumer hopes federal funds will help local brewpub expand
- Teachers union not ready to reverse no confidence vote in education commissioner
- Small group protests possibility of housing Central American immigrants in Syraucse
- Air Force plane found deep below Lake Ontario from 1952 crash
Advocates say Cuomo missed chance to counteract Supreme Court ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court decision McCutcheon v. FEC, striking down some campaign donation limits is expected to have an effect in New York. Reform advocates say Gov. Andrew Cuomo and lawmakers missed a key chance this week to counter act the ruling.
Karen Scharff, with the Fair Elections Coalition, said the Supreme Court ruling means that anyone can now challenge New York’s current donation limits of $150,000 for individuals, and win their case. The only avenue left for an alternative to campaigns funded by wealthy donors, she said, is a voluntary publicly funded matching donor system.
She said state lawmakers, led by Cuomo, could have enacted a broad-based public campaign finance system as part of the budget, but in the end rejected the measure in favor of a plan limited to the state comptroller’s race.
“Unfortunately, Gov. Cuomo sided with the Supreme Court this week by choosing his CEO campaign contributors over voters,” Scharff says.
Cuomo said the votes simply weren’t there in the state Senate to enact broader campaign finance reforms.
Fair Elections is part of a group of progressive organizations that includes the Working Families Party, and Scharff said a “strong case” can be made for running a more left leaning candidate against Cuomo in the November elections. But she said there’s no decision yet.